Short Note On Free Trade Agreement

At the international level, there are two important open databases developed by international organizations for policymakers and businesses: an overwhelming number of people at the international level, in both developed and developing countries, support trade with other countries, but are more divided on whether they believe that trade creates jobs, Wages are rising and prices are falling. [27] The average belief in advanced economies is that increased trade increases wages, with 31 percent of people thinking they do, compared to 27 percent who cutting wages. In emerging countries, 47 percent of people think trade raises wages, compared to 20 percent, who say it cuts wages. [10] Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa (in office from 2007 to 2017) denounced the “sophistics of free trade” in an introduction he wrote in 2006 for a book, The Hidden Face of Free Trade Accords,[73] written in part by Correas` Energy Minister, Alberto Acosta. Referring to Ha-Joon Chang`s 2002 book Kicking Away the Ladder,[74] Correa identified the difference between an “American system” and a “British system” of free trade. This last point was explicitly considered by the Americans as “part of the British imperialist system”. According to Correa, Chang showed that Finance Minister Alexander Hamilton (in office in 1789-1795) and not cunning first presented a systematic argument to defend industrial protectionism. The United States currently has a series of free trade agreements. These include multinational agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which covers the United States, Canada and Mexico, and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which includes most Central American nations. There are also separate trade agreements with nations ranging from Australia to Peru, which have three major effects on social welfare. Consumers feel worse because the consumer surplus (green region) is decreasing.

Producers are better off because the production surplus (yellow region) is increasing. The government also has additional tax revenues (blue region). However, the loss to consumers is greater than the profits of producers and the government. The magnitude of this social loss is demonstrated by the two pink triangles. The elimination of tariffs and free trade would be a net benefit to society.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.